Quote:
Originally Posted by madm1k3
So this argument of Obama should of sent more security is really a misguided attempt to score points for Romney.
|
Heard on the news this week that the ambassador in PARIS has a full time Marine detachment that travels with him everywhere.
The ambassador requested more security to accompany him wherever he went. Our intelligence and the ambassador both reported threats that were being made and that terrorists groups were planning an attack.
They were denied by the State Dept.
Congress had State Dept. officials testify to those facts this week.
The Obama campaign tried to cover it all up in a "misguided attempt to score political points".
But of course...people who are hypnotized by baby jesus Obama refuse to see any of that.
Nixon left office for covering up a break in at the Watergate to steal DNC files. Nobody lost their lives.
Obama's people clumsily tried to cover up this Libya debacle. Obama went on Letterman and went in front of the United Nations and tried to say it was a protest over a video that had been out since July. He did that after the intelligence community had already told him what everyone in the world with half a brain already had figured out...that it was a military type attack.
But he and his administration just kept on bullshitting.
If the media can spend weeks on Romney's dog riding on top of the car in the 1980's or Romney beating up some kid in 1960...I think that when the State Dept. fucks up and gets our ambassador killed that they are going to have to take their lumps.
My feeling is this: Hillary Clinton is the Sec. Of State. SHE is the head of the State Dept.
But there is no way that Obama wants to piss off Bill Clinton by having Hillary's head roll over this debacle.
"Misguided political points" indeed. Bill Clinton is the best thing so far in Obama's campaign.