Quote:
Originally Posted by mychemicalromance
It's amazing that a guy who has made all his money from running prostitution (take away the camera and that is what it is) and unfairly compensating his 'actresses' (they don't get royalties), can somehow now believe he has moral superiority and a moral mission to stop services which are only as guilty for the content they display as every search engine in existence. ..
|
False argumentations:
- Well... there is a camera... isn`t there a camera? The camera is not taken away because how would a producer produce his movies without a camera? Without a camera it would be prostitution or something else i don`t know but there is a camera... right?
-Models get well paid and the movie business is something different them the musicbusiness with it`s royalties
-A search engine displays content... a filelocker displays content and illegally offers it for download. Illegally because the offered downloads are copyrighted.
Hypocricy:
If you say producing videos is the same as prostitution and making a moral point out of it and saying it`s wrong, then how would you call someone that illegally offers that shit for download on file-lockers? If all that porn is so disgusting and prostitution, why won`t they get it off their servers?