Quote:
Originally Posted by TLE
There are two issues here that should offend every member of the adult biz.
1 . If this measure passes it will do financial damage to our industry. It has the potential to snowball in any number of ways. None of which are good for anybody here. This will effect YOU.
2 . This is another example of government interference and a further erosion of personal liberties, a tightening of government control. Anybody who works in adult already rides the very outer edges of what is "allowed". This is not good for any of us.
I see people picking away at the details, trying to pull it apart - break it down. This movement needs our support, Donate if you can (I have), Vote if you can, Spread the word if you can.
We are all on the same side of this issue.
|
Ernest Greene disagrees with you:
"For the record, condoms are used in every picture I shoot and they remain extremely commercial. I completely reject the contention that condom use would make porn unprofitable. That is a red herring. I said at the very meeting where you accuse me of flacking for irresponsible producers that I consider condom use nothing more than a creative challenge for picture makers that can be easily integrated into successful productions with a bit of imagination. I?ve shot, and sold successfully, more condom footage than any director in the history of this medium, starting with Nina?s first Guide shoot in 1992.
I?m all for condoms and always have been. They?re a minor challenge to a good cameraman and a good editor."