Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan
Pornlaw, interesting. I understand that the city to city thing needs to happen, but I doubt it will take very long. If AHF gets this law passed, they will work on the cities to speed up the process and move on to Vegas, Miami and San Fran. At least in Miami they will win as easily.
I would like your opinion on the goggle/dams etc issue. Yes, the law specifically requires using condoms to get the permit, but it does say to follow the other rules or you lose it again. So to me, this us all obviously applicable.
I just read the goggle/dam and so on part differently: to me, it says that goggles, dams and so on are needed if it is known that contaminated fluids are present. Ie, if you shoot with someone that is positive for an std. This is like in hospitals, it's not like everyone walking into any patients room is required to wear hazmat gear. It is only required if there actually is any hazardous material present... No?
|
As far as the cities to adopting the law quickly, I think the city of Los Angeles will adopt it almost immediately. They dont want to enforce the condom law they passed last January. They dont know how to enforce it and I believe they will adopt this version which will supersede the prior law.
As for the other 84 cities/towns adopting it quickly, I wouldnt bet on that. Government moves slowly.
Too bad you chose Burbank instead of Pasadena for Manwin USA's corporate headquarters... you could have avoided the requirement to have a Department of Health permit altogether.
As for the dental dams/googles issue, all barrier protection is required under 5193 and even under the proposed regs 5193.1 (they did get rid of lab coats though).