|
Saying NO to Measure B and also making the choice to shoot condom porn (ala Ernest Green) is not in any way contradictory. Personally, I have no issue with performers choosing to use condoms, nor with those that don't, as long as testing is ALSO in place. I also don't necessarily think condoms in porn would completely kill the industry.
What I do have an issue with, and why I support NO on Measure B, is that AHF is using their donations to wage a publicity stunt that gets everyone in an uproar over condoms in porn, when they could use that money for - oh, I don't know - AIDS Research, funding more clinics in less financial secure neighborhoods, increasing campaigns to teach those just coming into adult-hood why AIDS testing is crucial . . . 1,000 other things they could spend their time and money doing, instead of choosing this stupid battleground.
IF FSC was the only voice against Measure B, the Measure would likely pass. Lord knows they refuse to use the legitimate and provable arguments Fattorosi, me and others have been giving them gratis for months now. Instead they pull out half baked theories and stoopid arguments that don't hold any water.
So what ever happened with the situation that the money that Manwin donated to Stop Government Waste would fall under illegal political donations, because Manwin's actual corporation is based outside the US and that money was not to be used by SGW for supporting No on Measure B? And why didn't FSC and SGW know enough about US politics to know that might be an issue when they accepted the donation? Sure makes me think twice about just how effective FSC and the rest truly are in politics that affect the adult industry . . . .
|