Quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Fiction
This guy may or may not be a nutcase, but I would think you would side with freedom over oppression? Who cares if it's banned over there to look at non-government approved content, he's not forcing them to do it, he's giving them the opportunity to be exposed to content which their oppressive governments are trying to stop them from seeing.
That's what people do for Cuba, China, and even, previously, Iraq.
Again, he may be a nut, but I would think you would side with a nut over some fucked up government that stones people to death for looking at naked pictures.
|
In theory this is an ok idea. However, I myself am not going to stop this from happening, any more than he is. My husband worked for an ISP that provided internet to a middle-eastern country and was asked to report anyone going to a pornographic site.. He did so a few times, and then he asked what happeend to the people that were reported. When he was told they were publically stoned to death, he promptly asked to change accounts. Would YOU want to be responsible for the death of someone you don't even know? My statement was facetious, in case you didn't notice. This sexeducation guy is a known offender with censored cp on his site (or he did have), and he's claiming it's NOT porn when he has hardcore images etc on it? Give me a break and tell me he's NOT a fucking crackhead? Freedom of speech is fine, but this fellow is not right upstairs (aside from the fact he's a crook and even admits to using material on his site that he doesn't have license or copyright to).