Originally Posted by woj

I didn't mean offend you or any one else, I'm just stating facts, it's been claimed that women earn 25% less, and if that's the case...
why do you think companies are not hiring 100% women and saving 25%?

Only a fool would pay a man $80k/year, when a woman would perform the work 100% equally well for $60k...

so either the claim that women earn 25% less is not true OR there are some difference in the traits/qualities/etc that justify the pay difference...