Quote:
Originally Posted by notjoe
Simple. It's a lot harder to find infringing content on tube sites. Think about it. File lockers brand the content so that it is easily found and thus drives the traffic to their site. It's a lot harder to search a tube size go XYZ content than it is to search XYZ content on a file locker.. It's all about keywords, links, and exposure.
|
If, as you claim infringing content is harder to find on tube sites, then how are you so sure that tube sites are more of a problem than file lockers, torrents, forums and other piracy sites ?
Quote:
|
Next is the affiliate program. File lockers offer more incentive for people to spread links with clearly defined titles, tags, and explanation of what the content is vs a tube site which has "Blonde chick taking it in the Ass".
|
Seriously, you don't think detection methods are more sophisticated than that ?
Quote:
|
Also, the scope of file lockers is much larger. With file lockers you can pirate anything. With tube sites it is limited to video content. The ability to pirate different content doesn't mean that the download of that content surpasses a tube site which gets millions of hits per day.
|
How do you know ?
Quote:
|
When you take the above in to consideration along with the fact you've been focusing on File lockers, that would explain why more DMCA notices get noticed with file lockers than they do with tube sites.
|
We get plenty of DMCA notices relating to torrents, forums and other sites, all exceeding the number we get relating to tubes, also Google isn't focussed on one type of piracy site, look at the Google Transparency reports for tubes vs torrent trackers, tubes vs forums, tubes vs file lockers etc and you will see that tubes are the least problematic.
Do you really think that companies like Remove Your Content, Degban, Take Down Piracy and so on are just missing all the content you say is being pirated on tubes ? The fact is they all report piracy on tubes, just not to the same extent as they report to Google on file lockers, torrent sites, forums and so on.
I am not saying tubes aren't an issue, what I am saying is that they were the wrong first priority for an anti piracy effort to start with. We chose file lockers, it was the right choice.
Quote:
|
Come on, You can't really be this stupid to ignore what is clearly visible, unless, of course, you are in the pockets of well known piracy tube sites. How much is manwin paying you to divert attention away from tube sites?
|
I can understand why you would keep pushing this line however you are wrong. It's a convenient argument for you because you would like us to stop what we are doing now. You will say anything if you think it will harm our effort. Well I have news for you, it hasn't and it won't.
Quote:
Originally Posted by minimouse
DWEEB you actually think that manwin don't own a file share site hehehe what a joker.
if so your clueless.
|
Which file sharing site do they own ? Enlighten us.