Far-L,
If you had 'fraud protection' software on a third party billing system which processes millions of sales per day, would you not want some control over it's sensitivity?
If your 'fraud protection' software is doing it's job well, you can decrease the sensitivity a little, increase overall sales, test if too much fraud is getting through compared to extra allowed sales. One would keep tweaking the sensitivity until it was just right. Then one week tonnes of new fraud shows up, you have to tighten up the sensitivity to prevent it while you perform an investigation, until you feel like you have some way of stopping the new fraud from getting through your system, then you can relax the sensitivity once again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Far-L
So Peabody and you are off track if you frame what I am saying in that context. I am saying that people's understanding of scrub is inherently flawed and prone to the same mysteriousness as the stuff of urban legend, which it is not, nor should it be blamed on poor sales as a factor in CCbills processing because, as I tried to explain, you are going to benefit way more from that situation on average.
|