Quote:
Originally Posted by tony286
Well if you treat them well and they can make a living you dont have to worry about that. Wall st had problem with costco paying the wages they pay they said its not in line with retail. The ceo basically said fuck you. Because its actually good business, you get people that stay and not constant turn over, it becomes a real career. Turn over costs alot of money.
Also once again most porn customers are middle class that keeps shrinking say good bye to your business. Unless you run a porn version of the dollar store.
|
What exactly is a "well living" and how can any company be responsible for a given family? What a "well living" is for one family is not even going to be remotely close to what a "well living" is for another family.
Again, we are back to the "fair", "good pay", "make a living" phrases that nobody can define because a definition does not exist.
The Hostess situation is a great example. I looked over a few of their benefits and their pay situation, much better than many office employees get. They were asked for a temporary price reduction, which they would get back, and to kick into their health benefits program. I don't see how any of that is unreasonable.
Temporary pay cut, health insurance contributions and everyone gets to keep their job. Instead, they said no, that's not "fair" enough, and now everyone lost their job. That sounds totally "fair."
__________________
Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More -
Paxum and BTC Accepted
Windows VPS now available
Great for TSS, Nifty Stats, remote work, virtual assistants, etc.
Click here for more details.