Quote:
Originally Posted by EddyTheDog
Its still fine - Nobody has said they can not foster. They had these children for a matter of weeks....
It makes sense to place children with the most appropriate people. If you have ANY doubt that the person is not the best choice then you have a duty to do something about it.
If you get to the stage where the people who make these decisions are frightened to act because they are frightened of criticism then kids will suffer. Then we will all jump up and down and ask why the fuck didn't you do something?
|
Any doubt? Just because people that oppose the UKIP use the Racist Card in order to denounce views that they don't like (a classic tactic of the left),or find certain members that actually ARE racist, (as exist in EVERY party), it does not mean that everyone that follows the UKIP is racist or even a large minority of them are. If this couple had had some problem with the race of the children, they would have spoken up at the time that the kids were placed with them wouldn't they?
By this logic, then white indigenous kids should not be placed with labour or progressives, since they tend to think that white people caused all the trouble in the world and may act out that thought against the kids, right?
Guilt by association is a very dangerous road, especially a judgement based on nothing else at all.
If the council simply makes a judgment based on this one thing, affiliation to a party that does not include racism as it's platform but simply talks about cultural assimilation, as somehow proof of racism, and based on absolutely NOTHING else that the parents have done or said, I think that is utter crap, very unfair, and very divisive.
Just my.
.