|
In other news, if the government passes a law that anyone over age forty should be killed by firing squad - you can challenge that too... Even if they haven't actually shot anyone yet or haven't shot anyone new in a while.
It's nice to 'win one', but this ruling has nothing to do with the legality or illegality of 2257. It covers only the notion that an uninforced law is still a law and therefore is subject to being challenged. Nothing more than that has been adjudicated so far, unless I'm missing something? It beats beng ruled against for sure, but I wouldn't start warming up the 2257 document shredders just yet...
|