Quote:
Originally Posted by videobunch
I liked ;
"As previously reported by The Inquisitr, the idea to arm the teachers is not a new one to Israel, either. After a school massacre in the 1970s Israel decided to implement a a program of armed citizen guards in their schools. This program is known to work, since Israel has not suffered from a successful school shooting in decades since the program began.
In fact, arming the schools has proven to prevent attacks when actual potential killers have been shot dead before they could bring any harm to the children."
|
Agreed. What I don't understand with all these folks that are anti this concept...
When someone shows up at a school with a gun(s) and starts shooting people, then other people immediately to turn around and call in the authorities, i.e. the Armed Security Guards, to come and save them and everyone before everyone is killed.
Why not just allow those Armed Security Guards to be there already as the NRA is suggesting?
Just about EVERY article I have read about EVERY shooting in this country, or even elsewhere for that matter, ends with the original perpetrator being taken out by Armed Security Guards. What other solution is there really?
Why does this not just make sense to have them there at these places already as a preventative measure? ESPECIALLY our schools.
If they are already there as part of the norm to begin with, would it not take less time to end the situation if/when it arises?
What part of this is not just simple common sense in the day and age in which we live?