Before this thread gets too long... I'd like to say this...
Let's (for a moment) say that Gary is a well know webmaster. Gary never cheats...
Well, Gary ran accross this program called... let's say...
www.makemeabunchofmoney.com
He likes the sites they use and the payout structure... so Gary signs up and sends them many many sales.
Well, one day Gary wakes up to check his email and gets a letter fom
www.makemeabunchofmoney.com that says... "You cheated and will not be paid!"
The first thing Gary will want to know is... "How did I cheat?"
Now... having said that.... we must remember that great ideas in theory can be tremendous blunders in reality.
When SB came up with the idea of NOT telling a client how they cheated to protect themselves... it was a great idea in theory... BUT, once put to use... the idea became a blunder.
Imagine Adult.com telling you that you cheated and refused to tell you how or show you any proof... how would you feel? What would you do? Wouldn't you want to know how they think you are a cheater... or just take their word for it and kiss your money goodbye?
I would want to know. The courts would want to know too.
So, if the courts would want to know... then the program NOT telling the client how they are a cheater would put them on the illegal side... wouldn't it.
The law tends to side with the courts.
My 2 typing fingers are tired now... bye.
P.S. If Run were to pay a lawyer $100... then the lawyer would demand proof and this would all be solved... so Run, go pay a lawyer $100 to write up the legal request. Lack of communication only leads to flame wars.