01-11-2013, 02:05 PM
|
|
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 19,631
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vdbucks
In 2008 and 2010, the Supreme Court issued two landmark decisions officially establishing this interpretation. In District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), the Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm, unconnected to service in a militia[1][2] and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. In dicta, the Court listed many longstanding prohibitions and restrictions on firearms possession as being consistent with the Second Amendment.[3] In McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U.S. 3025 (2010), the Court ruled that the Second Amendment limits state and local governments to the same extent that it limits the federal government.[4]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_...s_Constitution
|
yes and big gun money was behind the lawyers on this one. fact is we'll never really know because the guy is long dead.
__________________
you don't know you're wearing a leash if you sit by the peg all day..
|
|
|