Quote:
Originally Posted by DamianJ
My motivation is to point out you are doing nothing but sending the person that pays for an IP a quasi-blackmail letter attempting to (legally) extort £700 from them.
You're not protecting anything. Which is why you will never take any of the John Does to court. You are extorting money. And then only paying the producers a measly 25% of that quasi-blackmail money...
*apologies
It's not theft, kiddo, it's copyright infringement. Are you a lawyer? I'd get one if you are saying it is theft. These pesky legal terms must confuse you!
Not really. It's a washed up has been that looks like Keith Harris.
*its
Yeah. I posted above about how that really went down. The judges have shut down other scumbags trying the same trick. You are aware of how Andrew Crossley got disbarred for trying the same tactic as you? You are aware of the US court cases being thrown out because there is no evidence? Cool.
|
If there is no proof of an infringement, and his company is just sending letters, why would he need other Content owners involved? Can't he just keep sending out letters to innocent people and keep 100% ?