Quote:
Originally Posted by seeric
As a former military police officer and graduate of the California POST police academy, I am an avid gun enthusiast.
The valid reason is that some of us enjoy shooting weapons. Legal ones.
This was my duty weapon.
9mm-15 rounds (Cali ones are 10). Nothing really crazy. Certified marksman 3 times.
I still love to shoot them. It's sentimental.
This is my home protection piece.
Mossy 12 gauge 500 cruiser with tactical blinding flashlight.
There is no sound in the world more intimidating that hearing one of these racking a round at 3am in an empty dark house.
Well, nothing but this.
As you can see, my intruder detection and eradication system is still growing. Just a baby at 4 months old. He'll be about 115 lbs when he's full grown and strong as a linebacker. Six more months and a home invader that desires to keep his arms and face intact would be better served targeting another home.
All this arguing about guns is just getting stupid.
People post ridiculous shit on Facebook about how sad that USA lives in fear and needs guns.
I'll be safe and sleep at night with my duel purpose pet and recreational firearms, as I know they're serving a purpose of duality.
I do not live in fear. I live prepared.
 |
look closely at what I'm stating and asking. we're not that far off.
I've never said ban shotguns for home defense, i use one myself
I believe in sport use of guns, and bolt, pump, and level action aren't a problem
I think handguns should be limited to a target range or hugely restrictive licenses, or police officers and such only
I like other protection ideas like dogs or tazers
I just think the average person is too dumb to properly handle semi auto and handguns and doesn't need them without huge restrictions - not all guns, JUST handguns and semi auto (and full auto as well of course)
__________________
This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!
Now read without the word dog.
|