Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie
I just scanned over that...and mostly read the "framework" (their SUGGESTIONS)...doesn't read like ObamaCare to me. It talks a lot about govt. creating incentives for the market to drive costs down.
Anyway...that's all built on ideas that were first presented in the late 1800's (as I already told you). Pres. Theodore Roosevelt actually confronted this in the early 1900's.
Obama Care is most definitely NOT from The Heritage Foundation. And if you believe that Obama sat down and read that study by The Heritage Foundation and then commanded Pelosi and Reid to copy it...I got a bridge to sell ya.
You're basically just spouting MSNBC on this one bud. I know you like to think you are enlightened (as do I as well), but that is the same pile of bologna I"ve heard on MSNBC.
And unless The Heritage Foundation wrote that in the late 1800's...they are NOT the author of Nationalized Health Care. That's just a fact.
They are a hundred years too late.
And the REALITY is...OBAMA is the one who pushed the Democrat Congress to both write it and pass it (remember Pelosi: "We will find out what's in it after we vote for it"). NOT some conservative think tank.
|
I read it
Heritage suggested the end of employer paid medical so employee's would shop for better deals.
I just don't see what difference it makes, Reagan even wanted healthcare reform, Kerr-Mills Act
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that