Originally Posted by dyna mo

dodge and deflect the fact you are uninformed about what you are trying to act like you are an expert about, classic argument style for conspiracists.


like you did re: the 9/11 report.





ok, grammar nazi, sure thing. in the mean time let's summarize the contest:

i've pointed out very clearly how royally lost *truthers* are, fuck, even the name is fucked up, truthers don't want truth, they (you ) want to be right. that because you are not basing your view on fact you are basing it on fear and insecurity.

next, i've pointed out what an utter and complete failure the movement has been, not 1 single thing accomplished in close to 13 years, yet you still cling to what you have been told, refusing to dig deeper than face value, not reading reports and 1st hand research, instead accepting other's views of that, you deflect and dodge from that.

third, i clearly pointed out how you fail at researching your point of view, you glob on to something you glanced over on a message board and run with it like it's fact, like the 9/11 report didn't include 7wtc.

moreover, it's also been shown that you have not come up with 1 single shred of any new data that corroborates your position in the years and years since the event.

finally, it's been illustrated here that instead of being able to admit you are incorrect about even the most trivial of points, you fail at being able to admit being wrong and instead, dig the rabbit hole conspiracy deeper to cover your ass.


on the other side of the argument, my mistake was a typo, so you use that to *gotcha* me.

classic.