Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutt
dude if you understood even 20% of that i'd be impressed. the problem laymen have with reading scientific literature is that there are many references to other scientific theories you have to understand as well using language that often has a different meaning in science that if the layman doesn't really have a grasp of understanding it makes the whole venture kind of silly.
most physicists are arrogant. all i know is only 2 thousand years ago which is less than a blink of an eye in the history of the Universe the greatest minds of the day believed Earth was flat and the sky was a curved firmament - the Earth was a snow globe. 2 thousand years from now much of what the greatest minds of today theorize will look just as silly.
|
i'm not here to impress you mutt and i cuold not give 2 shits about how much of that article you *think* i understand. i went back and posted it here because i thought some people might enjoy reading it, you didn't get it, i get that. don't blame me or my intelligence for that.
fact is, you're a porner, you are not the smartest guy in the room, or this thread, and you proved that by your comment that philosphers 2000 years ago thought the earth was flat.
fuck off.