Posting this here for the humor value. What's striking about the article is the way it talks smack about Manwin without actually including or linking to any of the evidence. It's like the skin of an investigative reporting piece, but without any of the bones:
Internet Porn: How One Sleazy, Law-Breaking Company Owns All Of It On the Web
Quote:
But how did we get to this world of seemingly endless and available smut? Who was the Napster of porn, disrupting an industry that survived decades of transformative media? After porn production went online, how did a few large companies distributing all the "for-pay" content suddenly get swindled and lose 60-80% of their market share to one corporation?
The answer to all those questions is: Manwin.
|