Quote:
Originally Posted by Yanks_Todd
If the tyrannical government(s) are always behind terrorist attacks against their unassuming ignorant citizens, does this mean there numerous extremely frustrated camps of terrorists upset that the government always get there first?
Seriously, since the conspiracy junkies have already started in on the Boston attack (way to early no matter who was behind it) I would like to know what they consider to be legit attacks.
Please list them and what reasons make you sure those where carried out by real terrorists vs the government.
|
To see who probably did the crime in this case the bombing. You first have to see what the consequeses are and who benefits.
You could argue that there is somewhere a terrorist organisation who hate sport and therefore targets sport events.
In this case this terrorist organisation would keep attacking sportgames untill they are banned.
You could also argue that there are terrorist element within the government who would like to have more power to check and control on the comon man. Because there are laws and constitution they are prevented from having checkpoints, home inspections and public searches. If the result of this and similar upcoming bombings/shootings/chemical attacks is that these laws and constitution are limited or deleted it is more likely that some elements whitin the govenment or elements in the world who control pupets within the government instead of some terrorist organisation bombing some people without any benefits at all.
One question for you, what would be the motive of whomever did the bombing?