Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
see? complete lack of preparation, couldn't even be bothered to google the film technology of the early 1970s.
|
What's your point, exactly? We could film men on the moon, but not on Earth?
Full marks for originality; I haven't encountered any "man on the moon" crank dumb enough to try and argue
that one before.
Quote:
|
not to mention a complete lack of comprehending the decade of work prior to whichever fucking president was elected at the time we finally put men on the moon
|
You're simply emphasizing the point. A decade of failure, followed by multiple successes under the most crooked President in history, followed by four more decades of failure. That in itself should tell any non-crazy person something.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
i had another chuckle realizing the conspiracist had to backtrack from his apollo 11 comment and update it with a conspiracy theory twisted comment after i informed him of more than 1 landing.
|
Nice attempt at trolling, but I think you'll find other people can read here, even if you can't. I made no "comment" even remotely like Apollo 11 being the only moon landing. In fact the person who brought up such an obviously absurd idea (that I've never heard anyone try to make before) was you.
Friendly hint: lying about what other people have said, particularly in a forum that other people can read, merely demonstrates your total ignorance on the subject. Typical delusional k00k behavior.
As for your weird tangent about the USSR and other countries - nobody questions landing metal on the moon. The issue is about whether humans have been to the moon, which no other country even claims to have done. You really don't have the first clue, do you?
Quote:
oh of course there were 6 landings but they were all under nixon, therefore......FAKE.
hahahahahahahahahahahah
that's some logic!
|
Yawn. Come back when you have the intelligence and maturity to address what has actually been said.