|
I'm not all that familiar with UK laws governing pornography however I'm a bit confused by this statement:
"...ATVOD found that G Spot Productions broke statutory rules in two ways ? by allowing trailers of explicit sex without age verification and by failing to place effective access controls with debit cards..."
So ATVOD is expending its limited resources going after legitimate paysite operators because of their promotional "trailers" when they could be utilizing those resources to go after much more egregious offenses such as the glut of tube sites posting full-length (stolen) videos.
Seriously, why go after a paysite operator with a couple dozen "trailers" in their tour when there's no shortage of tube sites posting hundreds of thousands of "full-length" videos? Seems that they could have a much greater impact using the same amount of resources if they went after the sites with vastly more content (and full-length at that) rather than going after a site with a couple dozen trailers. Anyone know if there's a particular reason why they chose to go after these particular sites? Someone running them piss off the wrong person?
__________________
|