Originally Posted by DWB

Just this morning I watched an official from Boston say there was no bomb. They said the older brother ran out of ammo while shooting at the police so they tackled him, then the younger brother got ran over.

There are eye witnesses on the street saying no bomb. Yet there is an alleged burn mark on the street, and some officials still saying no bomb. On the other hand some people say they heard a bomb. I don't know how this is even open for debate, as a bomb blast is something you either hear or you don't.

Confusing?



Of course I'm not going to be part of his trial you jack ass. My comment was for PEOPLE. If THEY want PEOPLE to believe a story, there should be more proof. I want to form my own opinion on this and I need more facts to do it. Unlike yourself who is not capable of thinking for himself and needs others to tell him what to think.

Please, and I mean this with all of my heart, the next time you're thinking about putting your gun to your head, do it. Pull the trigger. You won't be missed. Maybe you'll come back in another life as another nick. You know you think about it, so just get it over with.



What's there to debunk? I would just like to have more information about it.

They have tons of evidence showing they had backpacks on. Why can't they release a few without the backpacks? Or any evidence that backs up their story of a car chase?

What is astonishing is how many people just believe everything they are told if it comes from their TV or an authority figure. That is seriously disturbing on many levels. Some of us just want a little more than hearsay when trying to process information.