Quote:
Originally Posted by madm1k3
No your post original post is about why Wikileaks cables were being "ignored"
These cables contained information that everyone knew about. It had be reported over and over that there were chemical weapons in Iraq. Nobody disputed that Iraq was in possession of chemical weapons, so finding this stuff was expected.
But the basis to get into Iraq was an imminent threat posed by their nuclear capabilities. And there were no nuclear weapons found.
So 7 years after the initial invasion, after finding no nuclear weapons, after all of the money spent, after the massive loss of life, you wanted the media to make a big deal about Iraq having chemical weapons that everyone knew they had?
|
wait, you're blaming me for asking an honest question?
got it.

