Quote:
|
This seems awfully low to me, even though the percentage is good, although I am not that familiar with the non-nude market (or why anyone would pay to see non-nude girls).
|
Any time someone asks this question, I always reply: Why would anyone pay for nude girls? There's prob more nudes on the net than non-nudes. Right? I think since its only photos, I'm cool with making it similar to the cost of a magazine.
Quote:
|
I did not see a 2257 notice on your site. Although your content is non-nude, it still includes content per the changing 2257 regs, which could potentially land you in some hot water...
|
I am aware and I'll be taking this advice seriously. Thank you for it. I do make sure that I'm only dealing with girls 18+. As for brands, like Johnson & Johnson, I'll take that chance.
Quote:
|
I noticed that you are using PayPal as a biller too. Be careful that you do not run afoul of PayPal, because you could potentially lose your account without warning (costing you and your affiliates money), if you are not in compliance with PayPals rules, so I would run your site by PayPal's compliance group in case you have not already done so (instead of waiting for them to shut you down).
|
Paypal won't be part of the affiliate program. I'm building it so that affiliate traffic doesn't get PP as a payment option. It probably will go away completely as I do know that PP is uptight. Thanks.
Quote:
Good luck, and I also would recommend that you start including video too. 
|
I agree that video is important for the viewer experience, but for creative reasons, I've decided not to go that route. My theory is that the non-nude niche is about stimulating the viewer's imagination. If I ever do video, I think it would be a documentary/interview series along the lines of the "Shot by Kern" vids that were produced for Vice.com. However, that does detract from the imaginative element, so this is why I have remained on the fence.