View Single Post
Old 05-07-2013, 04:59 PM  
Arnox
Confirmed User
 
Arnox's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Radelaide
Posts: 2,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by wehateporn View Post
Max 10% adverse affects reports, FDA says it, it's very well known, this is because it's a passive reporting system, also problems with vaccines can happen months afterwards, so most won't pick up on it, mid/long-term studies would be required, studies which won't be funded for obvious reasons.

http://www.gao.gov/new.items/he00053t.pdf

Polio, now let's take a look at what's Bill Gates has been up to in India
Indian J Med Ethics. 2012 Apr-Jun;9(2):114-7.

Researchers reported

"?while India has been polio-free for a year, there has been a huge increase in non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP). In 2011, there were an extra 47,500 new cases of NPAFP. Clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly, the incidence of NPAFP was directly proportional to doses of oral polio received. Though this data was collected within the polio surveillance system, it was not investigated. The principle of primum-non-nocere [First, do no harm] was violated."

We have to stop pretending that there's no money in vaccines and the diseases they bring, this is not one big charity for the good of mankind. There are conflicts of interest all around Big Pharma, we can't be naive about this, they have revolving doors with the CDC, it's a self-regulating industry. They have money driven people at the top, money is their priority, they make money from making us sick and treating the symptoms. This is why giving them access to our bodies by allowing vaccines gives them a temptation which is difficult for them to resist, if they start up Diabetes Type 1, MS etc then their profits explode.

Many pharma studies have manipulated conclusions, they avoid comparing unvaccinated children against vaccinated, they don't use proper controls in the study i.e. a real control would be an unvaccinated person, but instead they give a person a 'Substance Vaccine', which means all the toxic stuff without the virus. This is madness! If someone dies in the study, they remove them from the study, put it down as coincidence. Independent research is rare, it's effectively like McDonalds researching the health benefits and dangers of their own food, they would not be the best people to be left in charge of the research.

Money has corrupted the Pharmaceuticals, the trust is gone, it's now a criminal industry which makes money from poisoning us and then treating our symptoms.


Before we move on to what Bill Gates has said, I'd like to ask you to go through what I've said and address every point. This isn't going to be a very useful discussion if you simply say "yeah but what about". You've stated a lot of things that are unreferenced or that I have responded to. I'm asking you to directly refer to what I have said in your response.

If you wish to talk about adult things such as vaccination science, you have to talk in an adult way. And adult way is to respond to my statements in response to your claims about Polio. Again, I'm asking you to address the points that I have made in counter to yours. If you concede that your arguments are poor and unsourced, I can move on to your next line of argument.

Currently, I have no interest in responding to your new set of claims, because I fear that you will just move on to more anti-vaxx lies and deceit.

Be an adult human being and stand by the claims you've made, or admit that the claims you made were poor, ignorant and a misrepresentation of the truth.
Arnox is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote