View Single Post
Old 05-08-2013, 10:58 AM  
Heath
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by media View Post
Wonder how state -vs- federal will work in this case..

Here in Oregon it is illegal to intercept communication without a judges order.. so you'd think if the FBI intercepts without going through the state courts then they'd be guilty of the below statute..

§ 165.543¹
Interception of communications

(1) Except as provided in ORS 133.724 (Order for interception of communications) or as provided in ORS 165.540 (Obtaining contents of communications) (2)(a), any person who willfully intercepts, attempts to intercept or procures any other person to intercept or attempt to intercept any wire or oral communication where such person is not a party to the communication and where none of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to the interception, is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.

(2) As used in this section, the terms intercept and wire or oral communication have the meanings provided under ORS 133.721 (Definitions for ORS 41.910 and 133.721 to 133.739). [1983 c.824 §3]
Looking at the crap that's happened in the past 10+ yrs, it seems as if the feds think they can override any state law they want. So this will probably be no different.
__________________
Email - popuplace [at] yahoo [dot] com
Heath is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote