Quote:
Originally posted by jayeff
Perhaps for content producers it sucks that there is no-one out there who will do the same job in a legitimate way. But is that a good enough reason to support someone like Steve Easton? You really need to be on the receiving end of this sh*t to know what he is like even when you have nothing to answer.
If enough of you cared sufficiently, you could joint fund someone to do the job in an acceptable manner.
|
Read my post above. We do the same job in a legitimate way. All our letters are very professional and matter of fact. We dont ad lib. Everything is done open and above board. If you want to be treated like a professional, you have to act like a professional.
I won't comment on APIC. You all seem to have an opinion about them already. I can tell you that APIC has, in the past, brought down some very big thieves that were difficult to bring down.
We simply have a very different philosophy. Theirs works for them, ours works for us.
BTW...I forgot to mention what we charge for our services. We get 50% of whatever we are able to collect. We collect 0, we get 0. If step two is required, than compensation shifts to 1/3 for the content owner, 1/3 for the lawyer, 1/3 for me. If step 1 and 2 are not sucessful, and step 3 is required, we are out of it and get nothing.