Quote:
Originally Posted by sarettah
This is the image you have as the background, al 1.25 MB of it:
Do you see any noticeable difference that would warrant using the png image which is taking 19 times more space and bandwith?
.
|
It won't let me quote you because there are urls in your post and me being a newbie, am not yet old enough to post urls. lol Oh c'mon GFY!!! Anyway ...
I didn't know it was the background that was taking the page so long to load. I do much prefer the png output over any jpeg, so perhaps I'll cut the image in half, use just the left half, fading to black so that on the right side, you can't tell it isn't part of the image, rather just a plain black background.
Thanks so much for your help. Really appreciate it.