View Single Post
Old 05-29-2013, 02:20 PM  
signupdamnit
Confirmed User
 
signupdamnit's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,697
RuthB, last year, May 22, 2012, on the security of your verification info and the consequences Paxum faces in the event of a security or privacy breach:

Quote:
Everybody must follow these procedures. These procedures are also audited ON-SITE by FINTRAC and Mastercard and our banking partners, and we have never had a problem. If there was an obvious data breach like the ones you suggest could happen, our license would have been revoked a long time ago, and due to the strict privacy laws of Canada, there would likely be legal issues as well. This is simply NOT the case because we comply with ALL procedures and regulations.
https://gfy.com/showpost.php?p=18959225&postcount=65

Compare and contrast to the way the breach in the first post was handled.

I need to note that I have nothing personal against Ruth other than an apparent history of working for ethically challenged companies. I'm sure the policies and the way these things are dealt with come from direction at the top of the company. I wouldn't want her job (defending Paxum) for quadruple the pay because it's a tough job indeed.
__________________

You don't like my posts? Put me on ignore or fuck right off. I'll say what I want.

Last edited by signupdamnit; 05-29-2013 at 02:22 PM..
signupdamnit is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote