Quote:
Originally Posted by mineistaken
I guess you missed my question.
How female leads be more prone to fraud if you paid equal amount for M and for F?
Female leads are definitely more prone top fraud when you pay more for F, but can you use fraud argument if you pay equally?
|
For about 2 years now I've looked at every single purchase that's come through to find any signs of fraud, cross-account CC use, etc. and when it comes to female names that are processed through, I find 1 of 3 things the account actually is and generally in this order.
1. An affiliate for an entirely different program has signed up using stolen CC info and has plastered a IM contact either throughout their profile, on the profile pic, or even in the username. On the other hand it could be a new affiliate of ours that's attempting to stuff sales through on stolen CC info to make more money. Of course the same happens with male names processed through on sales as well but way more often it happens when it's a female name/account.
2. A guy has signed up using his wife's/gf's/family member's CC for his own use.
3. An actual female.
The above are all for PPS examples or even per free trial at $40+, not a PPL basis but I'd imagine the results are generally the same for any other site charging female members for membership as well.