Quote:
Originally Posted by Webmaster Advertising
Not if it can be proven that his infection didn't happen on set.. Which it appears (so far) it is unlikely to have.
Using condoms (or not) on set had nothing to do with this performer being found to be positive, it was the fact he was tested, which the vast majority of the industry has been doing for many, many years.
How exactly did ab332 help protect this performer in this instance?
|
Please read my response again....it didnt protect HIM from HIMSELF but it can be argued that it DID protect everyone he worked with
__________________
Mike South
It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.
|