Quote:
Originally Posted by DWB
Your point is what? Guns were taken from legal gun owners. They were authorized to take the guns by force if necessary. I just can't understand that. Illegal gun owners, sure, take them. But legal gun owners... that will never make sense to me.
Criminals were looting homes and LEGAL gun owners had their firearms taken from them when they actually needed them the most. Where is the logic in that?
If the courts can order a cease and desist anytime they want, then the right to bare arms is a moot point. That means you can play with your toys until you actually need them, then you'll hand them over to mommy and daddy like a good little boy because playtime is over.
|
The courts made it clear that taking the weapons was illegal and ordered the immediate return of the weapons. The next time around people may be more reluctant to meekly turn over their weapons.