Quote:
Originally Posted by theking
I to watched it and the evidence was over whelming against OJ. They had everything
but a video tape. But I agree that Clark and Darden made the case more complicated than necessary and prolonged the trial.
I made the statements to people at the time when he was first charged that he was unconvictable because of his fame and immense popularity. I equated it to trying to get a conviction against John Wayne. Never in my wildest dreams did I think that he would be acquitted...I thought it would be a hung jury. But the Jury was stacked against him.
|
Please explain how EDTA is in every blood sample the cops tried to link to OJ.(ie. planted)
Please explain how OJ signed 50 autographs in Chicago waiting for his baggage and none of the 50 people with autographs say his finger was cut.
Please explain why in a city with 10k cops, Mark Fuhrman was the only one working and finding evidence in two separate locations.
I can stop here, because you stopped reading after the first two words in this post and
are not going to ever come up with an answer to those questions.