Quote:
Originally Posted by deltav
Sure, there's bias to varying degrees in most journalism.
But when the OP gleefully posts "Conspiracy theorists? sane; government dupes crazy, hostile", then links some 9/11 Truther writing for Iran's state sponsored news, it's kinda... umm... not all that credible?
|
well i find the distinction of 'building 7' to be important within this study, as well as how the entire article is built.
The fact that a lot of Americans feel this building was brought down because of an air plane is.. disturbing.
furthermore, i am rather sure over 70% of the US feel 9/11 was an inside job.
So, if you have an owner admitting he ordered the building pulled, and a poll statistic of over 70% of americans feeling that 9/11 was an inside job
why is it not credible?