Quote:
Originally Posted by SilentKnight
If your loved ones were killed or had their limbs blown off by a terrorist bomber...would you want that prick's face staring out from the cover of an influential mag in every store across the nation?
|
Actually I DID have loved ones get fucked up in the blasts. As I said, I am from Boston. I have literally hundreds of friends and family living in Boston. And no I have NO problem with that prick's face being on Rolling Stone.
If the article INSIDE Rolling Stone praised him or idolized him in any way, yes I would be extremely pissed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilentKnight
As Harmon said - it's called sensitivity. I agree with those "idiots" in Boston who think it's sad and pathetic his face is on Rolling Stone.
|
Would you be pissed if that same picture was on the cover of Time Magazine? Or NY Times? Hell, Bin Laden was on the cover of Time wasn't he?
What is your real issue here? Are you saying that Rolling Stone isn't allowed to evolve as a publication?
