Originally Posted by pornguy

I do understand your point. But Had it been my family or friends I would want to make sure that pricks life was as miserable as I could and if having his face on that magazine helps to consolidate the hatred of him in the US, then so be it.

The media loves to use us, why not use them?

Originally Posted by Dankasaur

Being featured on the cover of Rolling Stone means something. If you read my first response in this thread, you'd know... That's why people are upset. There's famous people who would do anything to be on the cover of the Rolling Stone.. Shit there's a song made about how important it is as a celeb or musician on being on the cover... Then they use that to put this kid on the cover? It's disgusting.