For some reason Mike seems to think the only reason to optimize a company after a spree of M&A transactions is because it is crashing. Obviously a company not crashing would _NEVER_ try to optimize their bottom line...
That more or less answers any claim he makes a few posts up.. but yet again he keeps claiming there are "layoffs" which is a term for firing people because of business slow down or closing of a certain group in a company (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Layoff) ... without ANY kind of proof or even an INCH of facts.
He gets 5 eMails of people that were let go, and he thinks "WOW, 5 people, that's insane!" - so now all of sudden there are layoffs all across Manwin!? Who are you kidding?
As I said above, any company, always, optimizes its operations, it would be stupid not to. If there is money to save without hurting the top line revenue, why not do it!?