Quote:
Originally Posted by wehateporn
It happened 2 months after the surgery...there's a lot of money to be made from it so all the more reason to suppress/deny the risks involved.  |
This sort of silliness is hilarious to me. Personally I know at least 10 people that have had it and they are all thrilled about it.
Secondly it is really easy to find out any eye centers that have had patients with bad results. Once word gets out, they lose business to the centers with good results, since there are so many to chose from. It's the profit motive that actually compels them to do a better job or they risk losing out to a competitor that will do good work. If it was some kind of government program then there would be no choice and no incentive to improve the quality of work.
Here in the US there are so many of those places that two things have happened. One, the price has come WAY down in the last 20 years, and the quality of work and innovation of new technologies and techniques has gone way up. If you don't give good quality at good prices, you can't compete in that business.
.