Quote:
Originally Posted by Due
where do you see that? The article you posted say they aren't. It's like you are debating with yourself. .. are you poor?
|
you're joking right? you can't read the thread or you didn't red the thread? because
1. i posted a link showing the exact article i c&p'ed the title from and stated it was a c&p
2. you fully fail to get the point i was making, which i also outlined in another post.
i'll state it again, in deference to you.
the research is irresponsible. any pysychological research that makes conclusions based on iq are worthless.
here are my quotes on that, which i already [posted in this thread.
i doubt you will be able to sort it out now, just pointing out how you so blatantly missed it all already.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
yes, for me, the article illustrates why i've thought for a while that psychological science is the most dangerous of all sciences. certainly, it's stress. but to base it on iq testing? that's laughable really. imo anything based on iq or, and even more importantly, the dsm is based on what others deem socially acceptable.
and then, and then! to make it worse, retards in the media can glob on to it and spin it like the thread title.
|