Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim_Gunn
Not to mention incredibly dangerous from a practical perspective if a vehicle can't move or accelerate at will to avoid obstacles.
|
very good point. though the argument against that will be that the number of lives the speed limiter technology saves will be far greater than those who will die because of it.
not sure how i feel about it, pretty much like smokers felt when they were stopped from smoking anywhere, though a smoker can go outside and smoke and smoke inside his own home.
why i think there should be more national referendums where people can actually vote on things that really change the way they live and die - representative democracy is fine most of the time but people should be able to directly vote on some issues. i don't think people should vote directly on going to war or not or what the income tax rates should be but on simple to understand issues like this and the legalisation of popular recreational drugs they should.