Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam
I got some bad news for penis-head Assad: Your sea coast has 7 - 15 nuclear armed submarines aiming missiles at you (and each other  ) get on a plane to Timbuktu you have safe passage now or put your head between your legs and kiss you sweet ass good-bye. Oh fuck -- nice plan "B" [/INDENT] |
The problem with all those warships aiming missiles at Assad is...they are going to kill a LOT civilians. Including women, children, and just plain civilians who have nothing to do with any of this.
That's one of the reasons I keep debating it with you...the chances of Assad himself getting killed by a cruise missile are pretty low.
But we are going to kill civilians by the scores.
And also consider this...we are going to destroy the infrastructure of the country. Destroy the airport, destroy the bridges, destroy their military.
Didn't we learn that lesson of what NOT to do in Iraq?
Because then, after we get done killing and destroying...what next?
A country in total chaos. No leader, no airports, no police, no military.
And then, just like in Iraq...the real slaughter begins.
I just don't see the logic in this at all.
We are gonna fling a few billion dollars worth of missiles to kill and destroy even more Syrian civilians.
Why not take that money and help all those Syrian people who are in refugee camps trying to escape the carnage?
Or better yet...take all that money and help the people who live right here in the United States that are going hungry or need medical attention.
After all...it is our tax money that is being used for this.