09-08-2013, 12:07 PM
|
|
It's 42
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Global
Posts: 18,083
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie
Why not take that money and help all those Syrian people who are in refugee camps trying to escape the carnage?
|
That's fine with me refugee non-lethal aide.
I am more concerned with where the Syrian Chemical Weapons end up and in whose hands. That is a realistic dilemma. If you live in the USA, or any other NATO country, you should worry. If you live in Russia, change your underwear now -- the Chechen Terrorists are well represented in Syria -- Putin is totally in denial -- the Cold War has been over for some time -- plug in!
Bombing the shit out of Syria, short of turning it into the Middle East Parking Lot Company, LLC, is useless anyway. Look at Beirut -- car bombs are still popular there after thirty years of on-and-off civil conflict.
I have said for a while that military engagement in Syria is a lose-lose deal. With the existence of terrorist elements within the Syrian Rebel Militias -- arming the rebels seems stupid. We should know better from arming Dick Wad bin Laden in the Russian-Afghan War.
My enemy's enemy is not always my friend ...
Basically, we are fucked. This is the nightmare of Vietnam that never materialized.
|
|
|