Well: Be careful what you ask for you may just get it.

Quote:

[ WASHINGTON (AP) ]-- The White House asserted Sunday that a "common-sense test" dictates the Syrian government is responsible for a chemical weapons attack that President Barack Obama says demands a U.S. military response. But Obama's top aide says the administration lacks "irrefutable, beyond-a-reasonable-doubt evidence" that skeptical Americans, including lawmakers who will start voting on military action this week, are seeking. "This is not a court of law. And intelligence does not work that way," White House chief of staff Denis McDonough said during his five-network public relations blitz Sunday to build support for limited strikes against Syrian President Bashar Assad.... http://www.wsvn.com/news/articles/po...ttack-lacking/

What if: The Assad regime loses control over 10kg of SARIN for example to a terrorist organization? Would you feel responsible for the result? Let's make if more personal -- what if the targets were 5 Las Vegas Casinos at a busy time of day and 1,550 die?

What if: Next time Assad really goes for the prize and exterminates a town of 40,000? Would you think that your hands are clean?

You can say it was meant to be but if you didn't try to prevent it at the source of the poison gas -- would you think that your hands are clean?