|
So vetting to you = legitimate use of filibuster? Meaning you don't question that any of these 82 filibustered appointees were due to abuse and miss-use of the filibuster? You think the very fact, prior to Obama taking office, only 86 times in our country's existence has presidential nominees been blocked by filibuster, as this was never something that either party abused. Yet somehow nearly doubling this, in five years is somehow a legitimate usage because they are all such horrible choices?
__________________
In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
|