_Richard_

here is SFU:

http://www.sfu.ca/archive-pamr/media...bc-shores.html

in 2011.

http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Rad...888/story.html

here is the 'no risk to humans', but with this:

http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/node/2162 'EPA to raise "safe" limits'

and the most recent article confirming this action from april 2013:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffmcma...on-guidelines/

After some digging, Mark, i found this:

http://enenews.com/california-2500-b...r-tests-canada

Simon Fraser University in Canada also tested North American seaweed after Fukushima:

?In samples of dehydrated seaweed taken on March 15 near the North Vancouver SeaBus terminal, the count was zero; on March 22 it was 310 Bq per kilogram; and by March 28 it was 380 Bq/kg.? -Vancouver Sun

and the article you can't find via google, but can via links:

http://enenews.com/vancouver-seaweed...els-increasing

and this is 2012. that's where it stops. no testing for anything beyond march of 2012.

they're lying.