I might disagree or agree 100% with this, it's hard to know without a fraction of the facts. I definitely agree with an essentially full term baby being surgically removed if the mother is a serious danger to it and calling the cops (for a "panic attack" wtf?? Was it a "Someone call the cops I'm about to kill my baby" "panic attack"?). Hell, if it was my wife I'd probably want it removed ASAP before the psych medication poisoned it, depending on what she was being given at the hospital I'd sign that waiver.
Probably the only thing that is more obviously problematic is not giving the baby back at 6 months. At this point she could no doubt show she was back on her meds etc. This has been in front of a judge twice, there is obviously a gaping chasm of information we aren't privy to here. Can't make any real judgement on how fucked it is or is not. It's not like the guy getting x-rayed and forced enemas for clenching his buttcheeks. Not yet at any rate.
|