Quote:
Originally Posted by rogueteens
You really are backing a loser by arguing for the claims of a discredited article.
|
So how do you explain this other article? (and if it is so "discredited", and there is nothing wrong here, then why is a high judge intervening?)
"Her ex-husband and her parents, who look after her two other children, insisted they would care for the girl. But, in a second secret hearing, a court ruled that her girl should be removed from her care for adoption by a British family.
"At a county court hearing in Chelmsford in February this year Judge Roderick Newton heard the mother beg that she should not lose her child for ever.
The judge ruled the girl should be placed for adoption – even though he accepted that the mother was well, successfully taking medication and had a job.
He said the mother might stop taking her drugs and the family offers were ‘not a starter’."
Sir James Munby, who is the President of the Family Division of the High Court, ordered yesterday that further moves towards adoption must be heard before him in the High Court."
??
Are you saying you have no problem with a foreign government just taking the child of a family in a secret court hearing?
.
.